Research | beeem

The Results

Live Blood, Four Cases

A drop of blood under a microscope, still alive, no stain. Recorded twice: once before, once fifteen minutes after. Same subject, same microscope, same sitting. Drag each slider. These are observational records, not controlled trials: they show what a practitioner documented, and they do not establish cause.

Miquela, blood sample fifteen minutes after the beeem device was used: red blood cells round and separated.

Miquela, baseline blood sample: red blood cells clumped together in compact clusters and short chains.

Before After · 15 min

Drag to compare

beeem IN™ · Human

Miquela, fifteen minutes after
a glass of tap water

Did: Six ounces of tap water, beeemed 15 seconds, drunk.
Before: Cells piled into clumps and short stacks, edges angular.
After: Round, separate, space between them.

“The post image demonstrates a significant reduction in cell aggregation and cell chain formation (rouleaux). There is also a significant improvement to cell shape.”
Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM

Source: beeem IN™ Live Blood Microscopy Full sheet

Derek, blood sample fifteen minutes after the beeem device was used: red blood cells round and separated.

Derek, baseline blood sample: red blood cells clumped together in compact clusters and short chains.

Before After · 15 min

Drag to compare

beeem IN™ · Human

Derek, same water,
same fifteen minutes

Did: Six ounces of tap water, beeemed 15 seconds, drunk.
Before: Compact clusters and short chains. Many cells irregular.
After: Less clumping, better cell shape.

“The post image demonstrates a significant reduction in cell aggregation and cell chain formation (rouleaux).”
Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM

Source: beeem IN™ Live Blood Microscopy Full sheet

Hoku, blood sample fifteen minutes after the beeem device was used: red blood cells round and separated.

Hoku, baseline blood sample: red blood cells clumped together in compact clusters and short chains.

Before After · 15 min

Drag to compare

beeem ON™ · Feline

Hoku, who was never
touched by the light

Did: Her carrier beeemed 15 seconds. Not the cat.
Before: Angular, irregular, crenated edges rather than round.
After: Consistently round and uniform, normally separated.

“The most noticeable differences were more consistently rounded red-cell profiles, greater apparent separation between many cells, and less compact clustering throughout the recorded fields.”
Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM

Source: beeem ON™ Live Blood Microscopy, conducted by Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM Full sheet

Lani, blood sample fifteen minutes after the beeem device was used: red blood cells round and separated.

Lani, baseline blood sample: red blood cells clumped together in compact clusters and short chains.

Before After · 15 min

Drag to compare

beeem ON™ · Feline

Lani, the clearest
of the four

Did: Her carrier beeemed 15 seconds. Not the cat.
Before: Heavy clumping. Cells angular rather than round.
After: More normal shape, significantly less clumping.

“Normal RBCs are round and the cells are separated.”
Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM

Source: beeem ON™ Live Blood Microscopy, conducted by Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM Full sheet

“Reduced erythrocyte (Red Blood Cells) aggregation may favor blood flow and microcirculatory dynamics, which are important for oxygen and nutrient delivery and metabolic waste removal.”
Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM · appears on all four sheets

Method

How Each Session Was Run

Two protocols, one for each device. Both are short enough to describe in four lines and simple enough to repeat. The feline protocol matters most: the animals were never exposed to the light at all. Only the carrier they were sitting in was treated.

beeem IN™, human subjects

Miquela · Derek

A baseline blood sample was collected.
Six ounces of tap water were activated with beeem IN™ for 15 seconds.
The participant drank the six ounces.
Fifteen minutes later a second sample was collected and examined alongside the baseline.

beeem ON™, feline subjects

Hoku · Lani · conducted by Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM

A baseline blood sample was collected.
The cat was placed inside her synthetic carrier.
The carrier was beeemed with beeem ON™ for 15 seconds. The animal was not.
After about fifteen minutes in the carrier, a second sample was collected and examined alongside the baseline.

QRA Testing

Muscle Testing, Explained Simply

Quantum Reflex Analysis, or QRA, is a type of muscle testing some holistic practitioners use. The practitioner presses gently on a muscle and feels whether it stays strong or goes weak. That strong or weak reading is how they watch for a difference in how the body responds to different materials. QRA is not a lab test, and it does not give a lab result.

Five Steps, Blind

The fabric comparison

Baseline. First, the practitioner tested how the muscle responded to untreated fabric.
Apply beeem ON. The fabric was pointed at with beeem ON. Nothing was removed, replaced, or changed about the material itself.
Blinded comparison. Two pieces of fabric were marked Fabric A and Fabric B. The practitioner was not told which one had been beeemed. One tested strong and one tested weak, and the strong one turned out to be the treated fabric.
Repeat. The practitioner tested again and compared the new reading to the first baseline.
Wash and retest. The treated fabric was washed, then tested again. It still tested strong.

Tattoos, Sixty Seconds

The one step longer than fifteen seconds

Before. A tattoo was tested. In the practitioner's reading, it showed up as something the body reacted to as a stressor.
After. beeem ON was pointed at the tattoo for sixty seconds, the only step on this page that runs longer than fifteen. Tested again, the tattoo no longer showed up as a stressor.

Why this matters: The only thing that changed between the first test and the retest was one use of beeem ON. In the blinded comparison, the practitioner did not know which fabric had been treated, and the test still picked out the right one. The fabric still tested strong after it had been washed, which matches how beeem ON is meant to work: use it once on a material, and it should not need to be used again, even after laundering.

Context: QRA is a complementary method. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, and these practitioner observations are not proof of a medical benefit.

Who Conducted This Work

The People Behind Each Test

Veterinary Medicine

Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM

Conducted the feline live blood microscopy and authored the observational findings quoted across all four sheets.

Quantum Reflex Analysis

Jan Sims

Nature's Remedy, Denton. Over twenty years in practice. Evaluation dated 30 July 2026.

Quantum Reflex Analysis

Irene Christopher

New York City. Thirty years in practice. Evaluation dated 23 August 2026.

Quantum Biology · In progress

Dr Glen Rein

Measuring the electrical activity of cheek cells, and a second set of measurements on water. Results are not published here yet.

Source Documents

Everything This Page Is Built From

Nothing on this page is summarised from a summary. Each section above traces to one of these documents, and the full set is available on request.

beeem IN™ Live Blood Microscopy: Observational Pre/Post Comparisons

The human protocol and findings for Miquela and Derek, with the practitioner's per-image observations and the Siegel quotation.

Observational comparison document

On this page

beeem ON™ Technology Live Blood Microscopy: Observational Pre/Post Comparisons

The feline protocol and findings for Hoku and Lani. States that the demonstration was conducted by Dr Marlene Siegel, DVM, and that only the carrier was treated.

Observational comparison document

On this page

Research: beeem Technology, Quantum Reflex Analysis

The blinded fabric comparison, the post-wash retest, and the 60-second tattoo protocol, with the two practitioners named.

Brand-colour research document, four pages

Read the PDF

On this page

Practitioner evaluations: Jan Sims and Irene Christopher

Two independent QRA evaluations dated 30 July and 23 August 2026. Both are image-only scans, so they are quoted rather than reproduced.

Signed practitioner evaluations

Jan Sims, PDF Irene Christopher, PDF

Download

beeem Educational Series: Tattoos and Scars

The documented protocol for tattooed and scarred skin: beeem ON for 60 seconds, then beeem IN for 60 seconds. Not removal, not wound care, and no claim that anything is removed from the body.

Educational series document

On request

Bioelectricity measurements, Dr Glen Rein

Cheek-cell electrical activity and measurements on water. The first pass used an earlier hardware revision, so the work is being repeated on the current one before any figure is published.

In progress

Pending

Session video

The microscopy sessions were filmed. On video the movement of the sample changes as well as the cell shape. Not published here yet.

In progress

Pending

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. beeem™ products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or medical condition. beeem™ is a wellness device intended for general personal use only. The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.

Laser Safety: Do not look directly into the laser beam. Keep out of reach of children. Do not direct the laser at the eyes of persons or animals. Use only as directed.

Results Disclaimer: Individual results may vary. The experiences described by users are not necessarily typical or guaranteed.

The comparisons on this page are observational records of what practitioners documented in specific sessions. They are not controlled studies, they do not establish cause, and they are not evidence of a health outcome.

Live Blood,
Before and After

What it is

What we did

What changed

Live Blood, Four Cases